{
  "version": "0.2",
  "status": "draft_untested",
  "purpose": "供agent按触发条件解释和调用的方法接口；不是自动评分器或已运行执行器",
  "knowledge_source": "/meta/aesthetics-research/mindmap-concept-selection",
  "methods": [
    {
      "id": "concept-claim",
      "name": "写出可被作品承担的命题",
      "status": "draft_untested",
      "document": "/aesthetics/brand-capabilities/strategy-to-concept#写出可被作品承担的命题",
      "trigger": "有策略词或来源兴趣，但未形成作品关系",
      "inputs": [
        "品牌依据及其状态",
        "主要任务",
        "相关者",
        "当前未知"
      ],
      "steps": [
        "展开谁在什么处境中需要什么",
        "说明品牌能如何回应",
        "区分业务重点、创意关系与实现变体，说明重点的选择理由",
        "提出竞争解释",
        "分别指向可感动作或配置"
      ],
      "output_fields": [
        "claim",
        "basis",
        "assumptions",
        "alternative_interpretation",
        "intended_relation"
      ],
      "return_conditions": [
        "品牌事实不足时回研究",
        "只剩同义形容词时回H1或H2"
      ],
      "existing_routes": [
        {
          "catalog": "thinking-routes",
          "id": "H1",
          "name": "从感受追问产生感受的条件",
          "document": "/aesthetics/brand-vi-thinking-routes#h1-从感受追问产生感受的条件"
        },
        {
          "catalog": "thinking-routes",
          "id": "H2",
          "name": "把名词与主张改写为动词和状态变化",
          "document": "/aesthetics/brand-vi-thinking-routes#h2-把名词与主张改写为动词和状态变化"
        },
        {
          "catalog": "operation-cards",
          "id": "S1",
          "name": "将同一个调性词分成不同关系路线",
          "document": "/aesthetics/brand-vi-operation-library#s1-将同一个调性词分成不同关系路线"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "concept-tension",
      "name": "用张力确定取舍与表达边界",
      "status": "draft_untested",
      "document": "/aesthetics/brand-capabilities/strategy-to-concept#用张力确定取舍与表达边界",
      "trigger": "多个目标冲突，或概念可以解释任何形式",
      "inputs": [
        "真实任务",
        "冲突场景",
        "需要保留的要求"
      ],
      "steps": [
        "明确两项需要共同保留的诉求",
        "比较分工、分时、分区域或可调关系",
        "说明不可由另一项替代的要求",
        "记录选择代价"
      ],
      "output_fields": [
        "tension",
        "role_allocation",
        "conditions",
        "tradeoff",
        "difficult_situation"
      ],
      "return_conditions": [
        "张力只有作者联想时回品牌依据",
        "目标本身不相容时重新界定任务"
      ],
      "existing_routes": [
        {
          "catalog": "thinking-routes",
          "id": "H6",
          "name": "将多种目标分配给不同资产与区域",
          "document": "/aesthetics/brand-vi-thinking-routes#h6-将多种目标分配给不同资产与区域"
        },
        {
          "catalog": "operation-cards",
          "id": "S2",
          "name": "让两种性格分别承担主次与边界",
          "document": "/aesthetics/brand-vi-operation-library#s2-让两种性格分别承担主次与边界"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "concept-mechanisms",
      "name": "改变生成机制形成竞争路线",
      "status": "draft_untested",
      "document": "/aesthetics/brand-capabilities/strategy-to-concept#改变生成机制形成竞争路线",
      "trigger": "多稿仍像同一方案",
      "inputs": [
        "概念命题",
        "来源关系",
        "允许改变的条件",
        "共同内容"
      ],
      "steps": [
        "改变组合、显露、顺序、角色或参与方式",
        "说明关系通过哪项操作出现",
        "推到必要触点",
        "用同机制不同外观的例子校准比较层次"
      ],
      "output_fields": [
        "mechanism",
        "operations",
        "touchpoint_effects",
        "difference_from_alternative"
      ],
      "return_conditions": [
        "来源动作未迁入时回H3",
        "只有表面差别时继续展开",
        "预期相同则重新判断是否为不同概念"
      ],
      "existing_routes": [
        {
          "catalog": "thinking-routes",
          "id": "H2",
          "name": "把名词与主张改写为动词和状态变化",
          "document": "/aesthetics/brand-vi-thinking-routes#h2-把名词与主张改写为动词和状态变化"
        },
        {
          "catalog": "thinking-routes",
          "id": "H3",
          "name": "在不同媒介之间迁移关系结构",
          "document": "/aesthetics/brand-vi-thinking-routes#h3-在不同媒介之间迁移关系结构"
        },
        {
          "catalog": "operation-cards",
          "id": "A1",
          "name": "把已有识别拆成可扩展的图形操作",
          "document": "/aesthetics/brand-vi-operation-library#a1-把已有识别拆成可扩展的图形操作"
        },
        {
          "catalog": "operation-cards",
          "id": "A2",
          "name": "用一个结构母图生成成员或系列",
          "document": "/aesthetics/brand-vi-operation-library#a2-用一个结构母图生成成员或系列"
        },
        {
          "catalog": "operation-cards",
          "id": "E4",
          "name": "沿使用动作扩展物件 图像与信息",
          "document": "/aesthetics/brand-vi-operation-library#e4-沿使用动作扩展物件-图像与信息"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "concept-probe",
      "name": "用最小联合稿检查概念的实际约束",
      "status": "draft_untested",
      "document": "/aesthetics/brand-capabilities/strategy-to-concept#用最小联合稿检查概念的实际约束",
      "trigger": "命题清楚，尚未进入作品决定",
      "inputs": [
        "命题",
        "代表内容",
        "必要触点",
        "认可基准",
        "困难输入"
      ],
      "steps": [
        "联合文字、图形和呈现",
        "加入一项内容变化或边界场景",
        "记录命题改变了哪些选择",
        "让候选获得足够表达后交比较"
      ],
      "output_fields": [
        "artifacts",
        "preserved_relations",
        "changed_decisions",
        "unknowns"
      ],
      "return_conditions": [
        "实现问题回A3媒介与生成节点",
        "命题未改变决定时重提命题",
        "表达不足先补稿"
      ],
      "existing_routes": [
        {
          "catalog": "thinking-routes",
          "id": "H6",
          "name": "将多种目标分配给不同资产与区域",
          "document": "/aesthetics/brand-vi-thinking-routes#h6-将多种目标分配给不同资产与区域"
        },
        {
          "catalog": "operation-cards",
          "id": "A3",
          "name": "把对象特征转换为线 面 边界与叠合",
          "document": "/aesthetics/brand-vi-operation-library#a3-把对象特征转换为线-面-边界与叠合"
        },
        {
          "catalog": "operation-cards",
          "id": "A5",
          "name": "从真实文字建立字体角色配套",
          "document": "/aesthetics/brand-vi-operation-library#a5-从真实文字建立字体角色配套"
        },
        {
          "catalog": "operation-cards",
          "id": "A6",
          "name": "把色板写成角色与联合配置",
          "document": "/aesthetics/brand-vi-operation-library#a6-把色板写成角色与联合配置"
        },
        {
          "catalog": "operation-cards",
          "id": "E1",
          "name": "把同一套资产配置成表达模式",
          "document": "/aesthetics/brand-vi-operation-library#e1-把同一套资产配置成表达模式"
        },
        {
          "catalog": "operation-cards",
          "id": "E2",
          "name": "让内容和身份触发模板分支",
          "document": "/aesthetics/brand-vi-operation-library#e2-让内容和身份触发模板分支"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "compare-frame",
      "name": "确定这一轮比较的对象与条件",
      "status": "draft_untested",
      "document": "/aesthetics/brand-capabilities/evaluation-selection#确定这一轮比较的对象与条件",
      "trigger": "候选合理但讨论混杂",
      "inputs": [
        "简报",
        "命题",
        "稿件",
        "主要未知",
        "必要条件"
      ],
      "steps": [
        "明确当前需要合规验收、条件选型、竞争选优还是效果判断",
        "明确比较概念、实现、贡献或判据",
        "约定主要任务",
        "核对必要内容、成熟度和接触条件",
        "记录顺序与说明等条件",
        "单列缺失输入"
      ],
      "output_fields": [
        "judgment_type",
        "comparison_level",
        "primary_question",
        "shared_task",
        "conditions",
        "missing_inputs"
      ],
      "return_conditions": [
        "缺品牌依据回研究",
        "表达不足回concept-probe",
        "目标冲突先明确取舍角色"
      ],
      "existing_routes": [
        {
          "catalog": "thinking-routes",
          "id": "H8",
          "name": "让竞争解释通过有目的的样稿比较",
          "document": "/aesthetics/brand-vi-thinking-routes#h8-让竞争解释通过有目的的样稿比较"
        },
        {
          "catalog": "common-methods",
          "id": "M02",
          "name": "选择比较尺度",
          "document": "/aesthetics/02-methods/observation-comparison#m02-选择比较尺度"
        },
        {
          "catalog": "common-methods",
          "id": "M11",
          "name": "分开反馈支持的判断",
          "document": "/aesthetics/02-methods/critique-transfer#m11-分开反馈支持的判断"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "compare-discriminator",
      "name": "设计能区分解释的困难输入",
      "status": "draft_untested",
      "document": "/aesthetics/brand-capabilities/evaluation-selection#设计能区分解释的困难输入",
      "trigger": "候选差别明确，比较尚不能推进决定",
      "inputs": [
        "竞争解释",
        "各自预期",
        "认可基准"
      ],
      "steps": [
        "寻找预测不同的任务或内容",
        "说明共用条件和必须联动的条件",
        "记录相同与不同结果",
        "定位原因时再缩小变化"
      ],
      "output_fields": [
        "probe",
        "predictions",
        "kept_conditions",
        "coupled_changes",
        "opportunity"
      ],
      "return_conditions": [
        "未区分时重查机会和解释",
        "动作未发生时先查执行条件",
        "相同结果不自动判等效"
      ],
      "existing_routes": [
        {
          "catalog": "thinking-routes",
          "id": "H5",
          "name": "从难以回避的使用条件反推选择",
          "document": "/aesthetics/brand-vi-thinking-routes#h5-从难以回避的使用条件反推选择"
        },
        {
          "catalog": "thinking-routes",
          "id": "H7",
          "name": "用反事实检查要保留的关系",
          "document": "/aesthetics/brand-vi-thinking-routes#h7-用反事实检查要保留的关系"
        },
        {
          "catalog": "thinking-routes",
          "id": "H8",
          "name": "让竞争解释通过有目的的样稿比较",
          "document": "/aesthetics/brand-vi-thinking-routes#h8-让竞争解释通过有目的的样稿比较"
        },
        {
          "catalog": "common-methods",
          "id": "M13",
          "name": "保留基准并安排替换",
          "document": "/aesthetics/02-methods/critique-transfer#m13-保留基准并安排替换"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "compare-evidence",
      "name": "分开依据 偏好与未知",
      "status": "draft_untested",
      "document": "/aesthetics/brand-capabilities/evaluation-selection#分开依据-偏好与未知",
      "trigger": "已有反馈或检查结果",
      "inputs": [
        "原话或记录",
        "稿件",
        "任务与条件",
        "对应命题"
      ],
      "steps": [
        "将所得写回它支持的判断",
        "区分稿件检查、作者推断、相关者反馈和实际任务",
        "分别记录没有机会、尚未执行和无法判定",
        "用另一合理解法检查判据"
      ],
      "output_fields": [
        "findings",
        "basis_type",
        "scope",
        "preferences",
        "unknowns",
        "criterion_revisions"
      ],
      "return_conditions": [
        "未观察到的结果继续补证",
        "来源疑问调用M15",
        "判据误判先改判据"
      ],
      "existing_routes": [
        {
          "catalog": "common-methods",
          "id": "M11",
          "name": "分开反馈支持的判断",
          "document": "/aesthetics/02-methods/critique-transfer#m11-分开反馈支持的判断"
        },
        {
          "catalog": "common-methods",
          "id": "M15",
          "name": "校准证据与更新判断",
          "document": "/aesthetics/02-methods/critique-transfer#m15-校准证据与更新判断"
        },
        {
          "catalog": "thinking-routes",
          "id": "H8",
          "name": "让竞争解释通过有目的的样稿比较",
          "document": "/aesthetics/brand-vi-thinking-routes#h8-让竞争解释通过有目的的样稿比较"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "compare-decision",
      "name": "按关键所得决定下一动作",
      "status": "draft_untested",
      "document": "/aesthetics/brand-capabilities/evaluation-selection#按关键所得决定下一动作",
      "trigger": "需要继续、修订或结束路线",
      "inputs": [
        "比较记录",
        "必要条件",
        "主要目标",
        "剩余未知"
      ],
      "steps": [
        "定位偏差影响命题、机制还是实现",
        "核对修订代价与可接受范围",
        "选择继续、修订、并存或分场景、补证或补稿、淘汰当前路线中的动作",
        "写明依据、范围、受影响产物和下一检查",
        "需要变更时记录请求或决定角色、替代方案及受影响版本；角色按当前项目约定取得"
      ],
      "output_fields": [
        "actions",
        "decision_basis",
        "scope",
        "affected_artifacts",
        "next_check",
        "unresolved"
      ],
      "return_conditions": [
        "依据不足允许可逆阶段选择",
        "未知不填写为失败",
        "前提改变则返回命题与下游"
      ],
      "existing_routes": [
        {
          "catalog": "common-methods",
          "id": "M12",
          "name": "定位修改层次",
          "document": "/aesthetics/02-methods/critique-transfer#m12-定位修改层次"
        },
        {
          "catalog": "common-methods",
          "id": "M13",
          "name": "保留基准并安排替换",
          "document": "/aesthetics/02-methods/critique-transfer#m13-保留基准并安排替换"
        },
        {
          "catalog": "common-methods",
          "id": "M15",
          "name": "校准证据与更新判断",
          "document": "/aesthetics/02-methods/critique-transfer#m15-校准证据与更新判断"
        },
        {
          "catalog": "thinking-routes",
          "id": "H8",
          "name": "让竞争解释通过有目的的样稿比较",
          "document": "/aesthetics/brand-vi-thinking-routes#h8-让竞争解释通过有目的的样稿比较"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "change_record": {
    "date": "2026-10-15",
    "basis": "/meta/brand-vi-research/capability-integration",
    "changes": [
      "区分战略重点与创意路线",
      "区分合规、选型、选优与效果",
      "补入共用接续约定；原8个方法ID保持"
    ]
  },
  "maintenance": {
    "revision_authority": "按当前项目授权修订；任务目标或权限变化回项目约定",
    "pending_location": "本次调用记录的unresolved与missing_inputs；知识问题回相关专题",
    "scope": "方法接口草案；新增字段未经过新agent实际接续验证"
  },
  "handoff_contract": {
    "document": "/aesthetics/brand-capabilities/agent-execution#从一次调用接到下一次使用",
    "record_fields": [
      "task_and_scope",
      "actual_inputs",
      "method_call",
      "decision_and_artifacts",
      "next_use",
      "unresolved"
    ],
    "fallback_fields": [
      "triggering_condition",
      "missing_or_conflicting_input",
      "lookup_or_return_target",
      "expected_next_artifact",
      "remaining_unknown"
    ],
    "rule": "按实际条件定位返回；不知道不填失败，不为全部方法设置相同审批"
  }
}
